Read Around the Planet
Videoconferencing. What was the stuff of Hana-Barbara’s Jetsons cartoons is now a reality. You can have a face to face conversation with someone thousands of kilometers away. I know this technology has been around for years in the form of webcams. But you can do so much more now then you could with the first webcam that was pointed at a coffee pot back in 1991. I’ve heard a lot of debates over the use of expensive videoconferencing systems (like those from Tanberg and Polycom) over $30 webcams from the local electronics store. To me it makes very little difference. It’s not what technology you use – but how you use it. Yes you get better quality with the full VC system, and there are more educational opportunities & conferences that can be held with VC rather then webcams, but these are just tools, and in the hands a an artist, even the simplest tools can make masterpieces.
So I’m not opening up this debate. Instead I’d like to talk about the educational potential of this technology. According to Wikipedia:
Videoconferencing provides students with the opportunity to learn by participating in a 2-way communication platform. Furthermore, teachers and lecturers from all over the world can be brought to classes in remote or otherwise isolated places. Students from diverse communities and backgrounds can come together to learn about one another. Students are able to explore, communicate, analyze and share information and ideas with one another. Through video conferencing students can visit another part of the world to speak with others, visit a zoo, a museum and so on, to learn. These “virtual field trips” can bring opportunities to children, especially those in geographically isolated or the economically disadvantaged. Small schools can use this technology to pool resources and teach courses (such as foreign languages) which otherwise couldn’t be offered. Teachers can use this technology to acquire additional college credits for recertification without driving to classes.
I have seen cases where children from the Arctic were taught how to play the violin via videoconferencing. At Meyokumin we’ve “taken” students to the Royal Tyrell Museum in Drumheller 300 Km way. We’ve learned about conditions in Afghanistan, and talked to a Canadian Solider in the field. We’re able to provide students with educational opportunities, and access to individuals that were previously beyond our reach.
One of the most powerful, in my opinion, is the Read Around the Planet conference put on by TWICE (Two Way Interactive Connections in Education). The reason I like this conference so much is because it’s so easy. You submit your name, recieve an e-mail telling you who your partner class is, then share a story with them. While that is a wonderful experience in itself, the real magic happens after the sharing. The students get a chance to talk to each other. In my school I co-ordinated 9 different connections – all between Canada and the US. Each time the students were amazed to discover that despite the different flags and weather patterns – we are all the same. Children thousands of kilometers away all play. The all love recess and hate math. They study hard and play harder. Each time I disconnected from the remote site the first reaction was always – “WOW, They’re just like us.” Didn’t matter if they were kindergarten, or grade six – mainstream, learning strategies, or an alternative program, they all reacted the same. They all knew they had just made a connection to people a world away, and they were just like them. Everyone has a different story to tell, we all walk different paths, but in the end, people are people – no matter where they’re from, the colour of their skin, anthem they sing, or grade they’re in. People are people. I can’t think of a better lesson to teach our students. Or a better way to teach it.







I have to agree with Shane, videoconferencing opens up a ...
LisaI have to agree with Shane, videoconferencing opens up a whole new world of opportunities. What never seemed possible before is now possible, and our students’ learning is so much richer for it. My spine still tingles when I think about our conference with a Canadian soldier stationed in Afghanistan, both when I think of his face and the excitement he showed because so many kids were taking an interest in his mission, as well as how empowered my class was to try and make a difference after that in their mission to help rebuild an Afghan school. Events so far away suddenly become so much more real. The idea of “virtual” field trips also excites me, especially with the fact that they can be interactive. Students can visit places like the Tyrell Museum which would otherwise be out of the question due to time and cost restraints. I also just took part in Read Around the Planet which was totally neat to see my kids and the class in Michigan talk to each other and find out that we really aren’t so very different, in fact, we have more in common than not! Videoconferencing allows us to come together on a global scale, connect with other kids and adults, and appreciate what everyone has to offer, in addition to recognizing that the distance doesn’t really make us all so different as we might have thought. I am a firm believer in technology, and I really like Shane’s reference to how it is like a tool in the hands of an artist, referring to how it can be used as far as your imagination will let it. However, one little part inside of me still wants to hold on to tradition. What about the classroom next door? Will we forget about connecting to what is closest to us first, or neglect visiting places in our own city because this technology is so much more exciting and brimming with opportunity? I would hate to see us become disconnected from our immediate surroundings in an attempt to connect with the rest of the world. Of course, the proper balance of each would be the most enriching and ideal of all!
I can see that happening, but again it depends on ...
Mr. GI can see that happening, but again it depends on the teacher right? We’ve both seen teachers that won’t even dream of taking their kids on a field trip, while others seem to have one a week. But for the former, isn’t VC a reasonable alternative? Not that I’m saying that’s all that should be done. I agree a balance in needed (one which I think we have with our classes), but VC isn’t a bad thing. Just a tool. Everything in moderation is the key.
It's interesting to read both Lisa's and Mr. G.'s thoughts ...
DannyIt’s interesting to read both Lisa’s and Mr. G.’s thoughts on the potential of becoming disconnected from the immediate surroundings in an attempt to become more connected with the rest of the world. It makes me think of the ‘echo-chamber effect’ that Phil McRae from the U of A speaks of when referring to the Internet.
Technology allows us to connect with a global population, and while this offers us the potential to learn more about other perspectives and ideas, Phil cautions that just the opposite can occur. He gave, as an example, a white supremacy website and messageboard. While people who share these beliefs may be separated geographically in some cases, the Internet allows like-minded people to gather together and perpetuate their very narrow view of the world. Having a group of people who resonate the same ideals and beliefs further reinforces those narrow views (hence the ‘echo-chamber’ effect). So while technology can enable people to access a broad view of the world, it also allows people to access narrow views as well. Think satellite radio, messageboards, Xbox Live, and Yahoo Groups.
Pulling this back to videoconferencing and connecting with others as Lisa and Mr. G. refer to, it goes to show (once again) that the technology only creates the potential, and the user ultimately decides how it is used. I’ve asked Phil McRae if his article is freely available on the Internet, but in the meantime if you’re interested in reading the abstract visit http://www.editlib.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Reader.ViewAbstract&paper_id=24102 .
Danny