The Classroom

Thoughts and Resources for Teachers
  • Home
  • Inservices
    • Writing Day 2006
    • Web 2.0: Blogging 4 Beginners
      • Educational Blog Categories
    • Web 2.0: Podcasting 4 Pioneers
    • EPSB Tech Fair ’07
    • IRA 2010 – Podcasting
    • NSG – Joint PD – Using Netbooks in the Classroom
      • Introductions and Overviews… The Boring Session
  • Resources
    • Blogging Programs Compared
  • About The Classroom
  • About Mr. G
    • A Child Must Grow – The Educational Philosophy of Shane Grundy
  • Links
  • Contact

Electronic Equity in the Classroom

As a whole – teachers are a bunch of hypocrites. I know. I’m one of them. I try not to be… I want to treat my students fairly, but it doesn’t always happen. Sometimes we can’t always follow the straight and narrow – but what I saw today gave me pause to think.

As I do every year I was enjoying (or rather trying to enjoy) my teachers’ convention. Some of the sessions were good – others dreadful – but all gave me something to think about, so I’ll chalk it up to a great experience. But what shocked me is hundreds of teachers freely doing what they frequently tell their students NOT to do. I know some were skipping (did anyone call their parents?), but they were also talking, laughing and being loud during presentations. If they were bored they just got up and left. They didn’t raise their hands to speak, and some even openly ridiculed their presenters or colleagues during “class”. Had these been our students they would have had detentions, calls home, and for the repeat offenders suspensions. But at convention it all seems ok.

And you know what – I understand that. We’re adults right? We can make our own decisions. We can be rude if we want to, right? What really got my attention though was something that’s been a buzz in my staffroom, and the subject of many discussions with colleagues – the use of cellphones.

In my first day at convention I saw no less then 17 teachers texting during sessions, and over 4 openly make voice calls while others were trying to learn. Granted – given the thousands of teachers there this number isn’t staggering – but it made me think. Why was it ok for these “students” to have their cellphone, by mine have to power down?

The obvious answer is as adults they are responsible citizens. But I know my students use their technology more responsibly (in my class) then these adults were. I’ve seen people so worried about regulating technology in the classroom, rather then trying to teach our students to use it responsibly. I’m told it’s because they need to learn there’s a time and place for everything – if that’s the case then we need to send a lot of our adult population (not just the few teachers I got today) back to school to learn that lesson!

Personally, I have no problem with electronics in the classroom. Though I do believe cell phones should be put into silent mode, I have no problem with them being on a student’s person. The question is what do we want/expect from our students. We want them to pay attention to the teacher, not disrupt the class, and learn the material being presented (and not all material is always curricular – I’m also talking about the social aspect too…). As long as the cell phone, iPod, or rubber chicken doesn’t interfere with those expectations, what’s wrong with them?

Recently I was asked to help out a college by covering her class during one of my prep periods. Her child was sick and she needed to leave. I was more then happy to help. But to make my life easier I brought her class to my room so I could continue to do some of my work while they did their novel study. At one point a student asked for some music – I apologized as I didn’t have my iPod with me, and so couldn’t put any on (I’ve routed my iPod though my class sound system – best thing I ever did…). Another student quickly asked if he could use his own. The school rule was no electronics in class (this is something we are looking at changing – but it’s quite controversial as you could imagine) so I should have said no. However, I personally don’t (and never have) had a problem with it so I simply stated my expectations:

1) I don’t hear the music
2) If I ask you a question and you don’t respond I get the MP3 player immediately and with out complaint.
3) I had the right to veto any music I felt was inappropriate.

If any student didn’t like these rules, they were free not to use their MP3 player. With in seconds 16 music machines were out and students were working quietly and happily. May I remind you they were not to have these in the room at all… 16 of them did. They knew it was against the rules and they didn’t care (much like the teachers at convention). But when “reasonable” expectations were set out, they were happy to follow them.

Even with all the “music” being played – it was one of the quietest classes I’ve ever had. Yes, they are kids, and they need limits – more so then adults do, I know this. I still had 3 rules in place, and the ability to stop this “privilege” at any time – more so then the presenters at convention did. As long as it doesn’t’ interfere with my learning expectations however it doesn’t bother me.

I can hear some of you now… “WHAT??? But kids can send cyberbullying texts and play games, and do naughty things! ” I’ve heard that way too often – and I laugh. Cyberbullying texts? LET ‘EM! Please! Do you know how much easier it’ll be to nail them when we have the phone number that the offending text was sent from??? It’s like a signature! A lot easier to prove who wrote them then the hand written notes and threats I got as a kid. And games in class??? I remember the cover games of hangman, s0s, x’s and o’s, name that movie, and truth or dare we used to play during class. This isn’t a new problem due to the horrible technology the kids are brining with them – its the same problems teachers have always had – just in a new form. If we ban the tech to remove these problems, then we have to ban the pencil, pen, eraser and paper as well! Not to mention the mouth, the hands, and the mind. These are age old problems – not new ones.

When I first started teaching I had a zero tolerance policy on toys. If I saw a toy it was mine. I took so many away my desk drawer was over flowing. I was going to win this battle! But I didn’t. I realized that I was going to loose when my students started to make “action figures” out of erasers and play with those.

Student on task behaviour is not a battle – its a war – and its one that neither side can win. We have to call a truce and set reasonable expectations the everyone can agree on – a clear vision for what we want done in our classroom – much the same way our governments do for our countries. With these charters of rights and freedoms we set up the frame work for our classroom rules. The following is the charter my class made 5 years ago, and which each subsiquent class has reaffirmed each year:

We, the Geniuses of Room 17, know and understand that everyone in our classroom is an important individual who is entitled to the following rights and freedoms:

The Right to Ask Questions
The Freedom to Make Our Own Choices
The Freedom to Share Our Ideas
The Right to Form Our Own Opinions
The Right to Learn
The Right to Have Fun
The Freedom of Beliefs and Thought
The Freedom of Dress
The Right to Make Friends with Whomever We Wish
The Freedom to Feel Safe in the School, Classroom, Halls, and the Playground.

We also understand that with these Rights and Freedoms comes certain responsibilities.

The Responsibility to Listen to Others, Their Ideas, Be Open Minded, and Respect Their Opinions and Beliefs.
The Responsibility to Allow Others to Make Their Own Choices.
The Responsibility to Study, do Our Work, and Pay Attention in Class.
The Responsibility to Dress Appropriately.
The Responsibility to Make and Keep Others Safe.

We feel that these responsibilities are fair, and in keeping with our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and will live up to these responsibilities in order to improve ourselves, and our classroom.

This is to core belief of every class I teach. We are there to learn. Not only about the subject being taught, but to learn about life. How to get along and do the jobs we need to do to make our world a better place for tomorrow. I just found it funny how the rights and privileges that teachers expect and take for granted during convention, is denied by them to their students…

Categories
From The Classroom
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Growing Up Fast in the Digital Age Upgrades Upgrades Everywhere… »

5 Responses to “Electronic Equity in the Classroom”

  1. TerryNo Gravatar says:
    March 6, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    Well said, Shane.

    In addition – if we know that to be effective, PD must be job-embedded, authentic and engaging, then why do we even have teacher convention? Thisis another one of those institutions that no longer make any sense, but we’ll keep doing it because that’s the way we’ve always done it.

  2. Mr. GNo Gravatar says:
    March 7, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    You have a valid point, however convention isn’t JUST about the PD – though that’s a major point. It’s the networking opportunities – the chance to connect with other teachers and see what others are doing in their classrooms/districts, compare notes and improve our practices. It also gives us the chance to learn about the latest “gadgets” and resources and talk directly to the vendors. I still think convention is a valid event, but I find it interesting to see how others treat it.

  3. Danny MaasNo Gravatar says:
    March 11, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Once again, a very thought-provoking issue you’ve raised Shane.

    I’m a bit on the fence with this one. On the one hand, I’m a big proponent of the ‘digital citizenship’ movement and believe that students and teachers need to learn responsible use of technology, including what they should and shouldn’t post online, copyright, responsible downloading, cyberbullying, and other aspects of web awareness. Too often we see things simply ‘blocked’ (and I’m not necessarily against that) but without the instruction to go along with it. So on the one hand, teaching students to use mobile internet devices such as cell phones, iTouch, etc. responsibly is the way to go rather than just a blanket ban. The Acceptable Use policies for technologies should not be a piece of paper one signs and files away – it should be a learning process.

    On the other hand, I have a tremendous amount of empathy for school jurisdictions who do put restrictions on cell phone/mobile device usage. Camera phones can instantly publish content to blogs, YouTube, etc. which was collected at schools secretly and is either very inappropriate or taken out of context. The music and video storage/playback capabilities of cell phones and portable multimedia players increase the risk of someone showing or listening to something inappropriate, and we know by the risk-taking and group affiliation nature of youth that someone will inevitably attempt this. All it takes is one student to have something seen by someone who tells the wrong parent, and a large scandal with possible legal ramifications can take place. While the odds of such things happening may not be great, the consequences of even a single event could be very bad for a teacher, school and/or district. In this litigious world we do live in, school boards (who in most cases will, by the large-scale nature of their organizations) will be ruled against. It’s as frustrating as heck to deal with the 4-page permission slips which resemble legal documents and to struggle with what one ‘can’ and ‘can’t’ do in a school, but it is part of our reality, like it or not.

    And let’s not forget the educational issues associated. While I’m a big fan of Dr. Chris Dede and his ‘Neomillennial Learning’ Style (http://connect.educause.edu/blog/jcummings/chrisdedeonemergingtechno/16662?time=1205269403) which suggests that students today can indeed multitask effectively, this theory is based on observations and not proven research. I’ve recently come across research (here’s an example – http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?i=37130&CFID=640863&CFTOKEN=14348438) which shows that learning is in fact hindered by students multitasking.

    So the devil’s advocate within me could ask, whose needs are we really serving by allowing students to text message and listen to music in class? Is a “quiet” class of students listening to their devices and not bothering anyone the goal?

    In the end, I really don’t know where I fall in this debate. Perhaps there’s a time and a place for everything – in the right context, perhaps common sense versus a strict policy is more advantageous. On the other hand, the risks are real and plentiful, and while allowing the devices into our students hands may win us the popularity contest of the day, depending on that time and place – we may not be serving students.

  4. Mr. GNo Gravatar says:
    March 11, 2008 at 6:28 pm

    I love it when you play devil’s advocate – and find it doubly amusing knowing you teach in the Catholic system ;-)

    But you raise a very good point, the bottom line is at the end of the day we want to do what’s right for our students. To my mind that’s to teach them responsibility. We need to teach them the “right/safe” ways to use any technology (from a pencil to a cell phone), and that includes a when and where education. However to simply ban them is in my opinion (and from what I can tell yours as well Danny) would be wrong. My big beef is the whole do as I say but not as I do attitude that I’ve seen some in our profession have. If you say always be on time for class, and make sure you power down – well then you better be on time for all your PD, and make sure you shut off your electronics too.

    At the end of the day all that matters is that our students grew both academically and personally. Thats all I ever want to see.

    But enough procrastinating – my report cards were due 4 days ago, and I expect my assignments done on time……..
    I’m so bad…

  5. Danny MaasNo Gravatar says:
    March 12, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Let me assist further in the procrastination process, my friend :) !

    You speak to the “do as I say, not as I do” attitude in our profession. You’re bang-on with that – from any teacher in-servicing you’ve done as well, I’m sure it doesn’t take you long to realize that teachers don’t make good students typically.

    With regard to the use of emerging technologies however, I wonder if it isn’t part of a larger problem where teachers actually don’t know how to use these tools effictively (or appropriately, especially when it comes to etiquette). I read a great article by Will Richardson a couple days ago that speaks (strongly) to this which I encourage you to read in your hours of free time (LOL)! The following quote sums up the blog post:

    “How in God’s name can we talk seriously about 21st Century skills for kids if we’re not talking 21st Century skills for educators first?”
    http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/urgent-21st-century-skills-for-educators-and-others-first/

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Categories

  • 1 to 1 Project
  • From The Classroom
  • Reviews
  • What's New

Recent Posts

  • Who Builds the Builders?
  • “I tried that – it was hard”
  • It takes a village to raise a child – but the world to teach one…
  • Looking for Gold to Use in the Class
  • You’ve Got To Have Heart

Recommended Sites


Visit Classroom 2.0

Tags

Advice Building Communities Celebration connectivism Creativity Differentiation Division I Dreams Educational Theroy Future Geek Speak Good Teacher Good Teaching Growing Up Laughter Learning Max's Sandbox Mircosoft Word Multiple Intelligence Network Personal Philosophy Possibilities reflection Reflections Reflections Role of Teachers Scholastic Keys Stories Strategies Stress Student Pride Survival Teacher Teacher Traits Technology Warlick Word Processing Year End

Mr.G's Tweets

Feeds and Stats

Number of Visitors to the Classroom

View Our Stats

Spam Blocked

27,363 spam comments blocked by
Akismet
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox